Monday, May 14, 2012

this is an important reason result in antitrust civil litigation case Diablo 3 power leveling this

129810431511250000_86The Supreme Law: citizens may directly sue monopoly enterprises Business News (reporters Zhang Huimin) yesterday announced the Supreme People's Court concerning the trial of civil dispute cases arising from monopolies of several problems of application of law provisions (hereinafter the regulations), as long as there is evidence of monopolistic behavior due to loss or contract content, industry association and other violations of law and disputes, lawsuits can be, require monopolyPerpetrators shall bear civil liability, no need to front as a condition of administrative enforcement procedures. This means that citizens can directly sue monopolies. The regulations will come into effect on June 1 wow power leveling, 2012. "It (the regulations) establish the basic framework of antitrust civil litigation in China, further clarifying the specific meaning of the relevant provisions of the antitrust laws", speaking on Supreme newsSun said military-people, judicial interpretation identified the party distribution of burden of proof, for difficulty appropriately reduce the plaintiff's evidence has a role, with the significance of the protection and the promotion of fair competition in the market. However SWTOR Credits, the industry pointed out that the evidence be slowed, but in the strength of citizens and enterprises against, still encounter significant resistance. Because of the burden of proof is quite difficult, the plaintiff win rateVery low. Data issued from the Supreme Law, since the implementation of anti-monopoly law on August 1, 2008 Diablo 3 power leveling, by the end of 2011, the national district courts handled civil cases in the first instance of monopoly 61, conclusion 53, less disposed cases in favour of the plaintiff in the case. Once sued telecom sector and is known as "civil antitrust" lawyer Li Fangping told reporters the first case-productionVisit said that in all investigation links involving trade secrets in the past will not work, this is an important reason result in antitrust civil litigation case, the regulations clearly allocating the burden of proof to the evidence difficult to a certain effect. "But if you want to fundamentally change the evidence difficult issues also needed to strengthen the independence of the Court. "Beijing asked Tian Law Office lawyer Zhang YuanCheat: "relative monopolistic enterprises, ordinary citizens, legal persons, such as the plaintiff and the defendant strength strong or weak, and forensics will have greater resistance to solve also involves further improvements in the legal system in our country. �� Others:

No comments:

Post a Comment